نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 نویسندۀ مسئول، دانشیار، گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The issue of repetition in the Holy Quran, especially in Quranic narratives, raises questions about the reasons for this phenomenon. Do these repetitions and various similarities in the narration of stories indicate a lack of coherence in the text of the Quran and the presence of different traditions, or do they signify a late compilation of the Quran and the influence of others in its authorship? Furthermore, is this matter contrary to the traditions and methods typical in the era of revelation, or is it similar to ancient writings and pre-Islamic poetry? One of the proposed viewpoints is the Wansbrough’s hypothesis, which concludes that the Quran was compiled at a later stage based on this premise. This theory has been critiqued and analyzed among researchers. In this study, the views of Islamic thinkers on repetition in the Quran will first be examined. Then, the Wansbrough’s theory will be critiqued by referencing the opinions of some orientalists. Evidence such as the oral style of the Quran, the presence of repetition in ancient writings and pre-Islamic poetry, the intertextual interpretation of stories in different versions relative to each other, and the evaluation of narratives with regard to the holistic view of the surahs will be presented as reasons to reject the Wansbrough’s viewpoint concerning the justification of the repetitions in the narratives. Ultimately, this research demonstrates that the repetitions present in the Quran are not only justifiable but also consistent with its literary and historical characteristics.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)