نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 حوزه علمیه فاطمه الزهرا(س)، اصفهان
2 نویسنده مسئول، دانشیار دانشگاه یزد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
interpretations of the ancients from the practical point of view, and special attention has been paid to those two in contemporary times; But they have been addressed less in terms of theory and basics. Also, due to the fact that adaptation refers to the difference of interpretive views and approximation to the similarity of interpretive views, it is necessary to examine and compare these two interpretations scientifically and accurately in order to be able to answer the question of whether it is possible to accompany these two interpretations together or not?
The results of this research, which was carried out using a descriptive-analytical method, show that it is not possible to combine comparative interpretation with approximation in two cases: one is when the approach of comparative interpretation is polemical or religious, and the other is when the commentator has an extreme approximation approach, in which case she remains silent in the face of verses that have differences of opinion among religions
But if the comparative interpretation examines and criticizes the views and opinions of commentators with a balanced and correct approach, they overlap and help each other to reach their defined goals without causing harm. Considering that in two cases of impossibility, the result of the interpretation is outside their goals and leads to the intensification of disputes; Therefore, the only way to achieve a comparative interpretation and an effective approximate interpretation is to use both of them together
کلیدواژهها [English]
)