نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 مدرسه قرآن جامعه المصطفی
2 قرآن و حقوق جامعه المصطفی العالمیه
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Preferential rules are the rules that the interpreter uses to identify the best word among different words in the interpretation of the Qur'anic verses. One of these rules is the rule of "submitting Quranic verses to opposing opinions"; According to this rule, the commentator in interpreting a verse prefers the word that is consistent with the appearance of other verses in line with the verse in question over the opposite word. The aim of this research is to investigate the approach of two of the most important Shia and Sunni contemporary commentators, regarding this rule in verses (Furqan/22) and (Baqarah/48). This article is written with a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative approach. The findings of this research are based on the fact that Allameh Tabatabai used the preferred rule in the interpretation of the mentioned verses and according to the appearance of other verses, he considered the meaning of (Yum) in the verse (Furqan/22) to be the day of death, and there are opposing opinions. has not accepted; However, in interpreting this hadith, Ibn Ashur neglected the preferred rule and did not use it and accepted the opposite sayings. In the interpretation of the verse (Baqarah/28), although both commentators have paid attention to the preferred rule and accepted the possibility of intercession for others with God's permission; But Allameh's approach in using this rule was much stronger than Ibn Ashur's.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)