نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد، گروه علوم قرآنی و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه علوم قرآنی و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
3 نویسنده مسئول، دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم قرآنی و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Prophets of God, upon the definitive establishment of divine punishment for disbelievers, have consistently shown absolute submission and have never resisted God’s decree. However, two Quranic cases have been interpreted by some exegetes as signs of disagreement with divine command; Prophet Noah’s (pbuh) plea regarding the fate of his son and prophet Abraham’s (pbuh) intercession on behalf of the people of Lut. This research employs a library-based approach and a descriptive-analytical method to examine these two cases by analyzing relevant exegetical views and Qur’anic verses. The research proceeded by first extracting all relevant Quranic verses concerning the interactions of these two prophets with disbelievers, followed by a systematic exegetical and interpretive analysis. Findings indicate that Prophet Noah (pbuh) was unaware of his son’s spiritual state and did not request exemption from punishment but rather sought clarification. Likewise, Prophet Abraham’s (pbuh) argument, given the commendable attributes ascribed to him in the Qur’an and his lack of certainty regarding the punishment, is interpreted as a praiseworthy effort motivated by compassion and a desire for guidance. Accordingly, neither case constitutes a breach of prophetic infallibility (Iṣmah) and personality, nor do these actions contradict the broader ethical and theological framework governing prophetic conduct.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)