نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجو دکتری تفسیر تطبیقی دانشگاه قم، طلبه درس خارج حوزه علمیه قم
2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه قم
3 دانشجوی دکتری علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه میبد، دانش آموخته سطح ۳ مرکز تخصصی حدیث حوزه علمیه قم
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
According to verse 125 of Surah Nahl, the methods of the Qur'anic call to religion are wisdom, good preaching, and good argument. Some commentators and logicians have applied the mentioned methods to arguments, speeches and logical arguments. Reflecting on the literal meaning and Quranic usages of the three ways of calling to religion will make the incorrectness of the comparison clear. There is a difference between Quranic wisdom and logical argument in many ways. Wisdom in the language of the Qur'an is different from the conventional logical argument in terms of its origin, the way to reach it, the range of application, the scope of the result and the impact on humans. Hasan's sermon is also different from logical speech in terms of its constituent elements and its effective quality. Also, Ahsan's debate in the Qur'anic culture, in addition to the difference in the premises in terms of being right or not, is also different from the logical debate in the motivation and purpose of using it
کلیدواژهها [English]