Document Type : Original
Authors
1
PhD Student in Qurʾān Sciences and Ḥadīth, Faculty of Theology and the Teachings of the Ahl-al-Bayt, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2
Corresponding Author, Assistant Professor, Department of Qurʾānic Sciences and Ḥadīth, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
3
Professor, Department of Qurʾānic Sciences and Ḥadīth, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.
Abstract
The list of the order of revelation according to Jābir ibn Zayd represents one of the notable hadith-based chronologies in the dating of the Qurʾān. A majority of Qurʾānic scholars, when reporting or utilizing this order, primarily reference al-Itqān by Suyūṭī, disregarding other sources and versions of this narration. However, this narrative has been transmitted in earlier sources, such as al-Bayān fī ʿAdad Āyāt al-Qurʾān by Abū ʿAmr al-Dānī, through different chains of transmission and with a more complete text. Furthermore, discrepancies and omissions in various manuscripts and printed editions of al-Itqān have occurred, leading to erroneous assumptions in contemporary works that this list lacks certain surahs such as al-Nūr, al-Ḥujurāt, and al-ʿĀdiyāt. Additionally, the list in al-Itqān includes al-Fātiḥah, and several Qurʾānic scholars have used this version to date the revelation of al-Fātiḥah. Investigating the various texts of Jābir’s narration across different sources reveals that the inclusion of al-Fātiḥah in this list might be the result of subsequent scholarly interpretations. This article, by consulting the oldest available manuscripts and sources, introduces the sources of Jābir ibn Zayd’s narration and conducts a genealogical analysis, comparing different hadith lists, to explore the nature, validity, and foundational principles of this chronology. The findings demonstrate that some minor discrepancies in Jābir’s list compared to other hadith-based lists could be attributed to errors in transmission or transcription. However, significant differences, such as the placement of Sūrah al-Mā’idah among the earliest Medinan surahs and the omissions and additions concerning Sūrah al-Fātiḥah, cannot be explained as mere errors. These divergences likely arise from deliberate scholarly interpretation and adjustments in the foundational list in favor of alternative opinions.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)