<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Razavi University of Islamic Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Quranic Doctrines</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-9378</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>17</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Examination of the Tradition “Read such as People Read” with a Look to the Sheikh Ansari Comprehension</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Examination of the Tradition “Read such as People Read” with a Look to the Sheikh Ansari Comprehension</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>49</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>70</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1209</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30513/qd.2013.1209</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Muhammad Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahdavi Rad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associated professor at Tehran University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Delbari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associated professor at Razavi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nosrati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor at Razavi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>From the ancient times, there has been a debate between Islamic scholars and jurists on which recitation of the Quran is authentic and acceptable. Different opinions have stated to answer this question. The examination of evidences clarifies that the most important reason is the tradition “Read such as people read”. This research with analytic-descriptive method studies the mentioned tradition from a textual perspective and the genuineness of the Hadith and shows the genuineness of the Hadith and the sheikh Ansari comprehension is not defensible. The author believes that the tradition proves the BOOK and the present recitation and rejects the other.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">From the ancient times, there has been a debate between Islamic scholars and jurists on which recitation of the Quran is authentic and acceptable. Different opinions have stated to answer this question. The examination of evidences clarifies that the most important reason is the tradition “Read such as people read”. This research with analytic-descriptive method studies the mentioned tradition from a textual perspective and the genuineness of the Hadith and shows the genuineness of the Hadith and the sheikh Ansari comprehension is not defensible. The author believes that the tradition proves the BOOK and the present recitation and rejects the other.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The Quran</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Recitation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">People’s recitation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The seven readings of the Quran</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sheikh Ansari</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://qd.razavi.ac.ir/article_1209_b73af85b5e16971065e174575715105a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
